Skip to main content

Life, In Stages

 

Image shows two teal blue eggs in a nest

I had a revelation today.
I'm currently reading a book - Managing Complexity, by Robin Wood - which was published in the year 2000.

My first thought: Where the heck did that time go? Why haven't I achieved much in a quarter of a century?!

My second thought was the revelation: 25 years ago, I was 13. I had five years before I would even be a legal adult.  It would be two years before I got my first "proper" part-time job (as opposed to earning pocket money doing gardening, car washing, and dog-walking for the predominantly elderly neighbours in the street I grew up in.) 

In those twenty-five years, this is what I have achieved:

. I've worked in youthwork, retail, business development, finance, marketing, project management and leadership in the non-profit space.

. I've survived two major psychotic episodes, and learned to manage schizophrenia alongside the challenges of working full time, and living independently.

. I've survived violent abuse, and homelessness.

. I've published a total of 14 books, and had 5 articles published.

. I've won three writing competitions.

. I've built a loving, supportive, happy marriage.

. I've come through a major global pandemic, during which I was under full shielding protocols.

. I've had to navigate the reality of losing my sight.

That's...actually quite a lot, especially considering that roughly half of it, and all of the high impact negatives (except for the pandemic and the sight loss) happened before I was 30.

I then realised something else: 25 years from now, I will be 63. 

The likelihood, going by medical estimates, is that I will have been completely blind for around 13yrs at that point, but I'm working on creating a viable employment which will accommodate that - check out The Productive Pessimist Ltd, and see if anything resonates as something it would benefit you to pay for, so that you get what you need, and I actually get to have the 'viable' employment I need.

25 years from 2050, I'll be 88.

It's likely I could still be alive at that point - I don't smoke, I don't drink alcohol every day, I eat a fair amount of fresh food, including fruit and vegetables, I do strength, resistance, cardio, and flexibility workouts 3-5 times per week.  Within my family, people have died at ages ranging from 62-102 years old.  

Assuming the best-case scenario, that I am still alive at the age of 88, the perspective this revelation has given me is:
. I've spent the past 25 years building stability

. I can spend the next 25 years building success - my business, my reputation as a speaker and writer, the continuation of my marriage.

. I can spend the final (presumed) 25 years I assume I may get to enjoy building a legacy - the roadmap for those who'll come after me, have their own mid-life freakouts at how "far behind" their peers they are.

Of course, the world may end in the next 25 months.  And that will seriously mess with a lot of peoples' plans. But, if it ends completely, it won't matter to anyone.

If it ends in the usual, shambolic, partial, tattered way that worlds (or at least paradigms which created experienced worlds) have always ended up until now...well, that will be frustrating, but there will be less urgency or relevance to anyone's plans in the echo of that particular aftermath.

But we've been here before, many times, and, despite peoples' fears for the end of the world, the world has simply been reborn into something it turned out people could manage to live well in after all.

I've done a lot in the past 25 years.
Doing the things I've done in that 25 years has taken a lot out of me.
But I feel sufficiently recalibrated and re-resourced, and am ready to begin the work I can do in the next two stages of 25 years.

I've lived a lifetime in the past 25 years.
But I have at least two more lifetimes to create.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Reform - Elect Problems, Get Solutions

After every General Election - literally, immediately  after, as newly-elected MPs for various regions are announced by returning officers - there are calls for a "reform of First Past the Post ".  The Party of government wants to scrap First Past the Post because they believe it will make it easier for them to win subsequent elections, with larger majorities. Parties experiencing returning an MP to Parliament for the first time want to scrap First Past the Post because they believe it will result in them returning more  MPs at future elections.  And the losing Party wants to scrap First Past the Post because...well, they don't want to lose again, and demanding a change to the way votes are counted is a lot easier than actually doing the work to become re-electable. A lot of ordinary people in the electorate want to scrap First Past the Post, too, because it just seems fundamentally unfair that larger regions are always more likely to get their preferred candidate el...

Identity, Experience, and What's in a Name

  If you've taken a moment to have a look at my  publication history , you'll notice that my writing to date has been published under the name Ashley Ford-McAllister  (as was my previous blog, that I lost the login details for...) So - why the move to Ash Ford-McAllister?  It's a very small change on paper (which it technically isn't - Ashley is still my legal first name) but a huge change on a personal level, and one which reflects a lot. Ash  was a name that, at 9yrs old, and with an absolute certainty that the answer to the question of "What do you want to be when you grow up?" was "a man", and a belief that the "change" people kept warning me about would be when I'd get the same genitals as my Dad had (yes, a female puberty came as a hell of a shock. Such a severe and upsetting one, in fact,  that I just assumed what was probably severe endometriosis was "just normal girl stuff" - PSA: if you're bleeding for 6+ days, a...

UK Welfare Reforms: An Ambitious Disabled Person's Response to Changes

  So...we (apparently) enter a new (if likely to be very prolonged) phase of Brand GB's "Business as Usual." That's a good  thing, to my mind - Britain's attitude towards its disabled citizens hasn't really shifted since the Victorian era; we're "unfortunates", the "deserving poor", and the State's duty was to find us "occupation" if it could (think basket weaving and piano tuning for the 19th century blind - I wouldn't mind weaving baskets, honestly, but so few people have their own piano these days, that career option is out, because I'd be expected to travel considerable distances to make enough to keep the lights on, and the wolf from the door of my personal life)  and simply doling out "alms" (handouts with a heavy dollop of pity and assumption of incompetence) when there simply wasn't the need for the kind of work we could be trained to do. Over 200years later? Yeah...it's long past time for...